<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another tool for minimising water waste</title>
	<atom:link href="http://melbourne.metblogs.com/2008/11/11/another-tool-for-minimising-water-waste/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://melbourne.metblogs.com/2008/11/11/another-tool-for-minimising-water-waste/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:48:26 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: maree</title>
		<link>http://melbourne.metblogs.com/2008/11/11/another-tool-for-minimising-water-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-3483</link>
		<dc:creator>maree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 07:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://melbourne.metblogs.com/?p=2122#comment-3483</guid>
		<description>Well if it has to be all about the money...

If you have another use for this water that normally goes down the drain - such as growing your own fruit and vegetables - you will soon reap (pun intended) the benefits of such water saving products.

Some water suppliers have a scale where you pay higher prices for water once you go over 440, and then 880 litres in a household (I think they are the figures).

Water doubling in price before 2012 has been widely written about so payback is unlikely to be that long at all for most users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if it has to be all about the money&#8230;</p>
<p>If you have another use for this water that normally goes down the drain &#8211; such as growing your own fruit and vegetables &#8211; you will soon reap (pun intended) the benefits of such water saving products.</p>
<p>Some water suppliers have a scale where you pay higher prices for water once you go over 440, and then 880 litres in a household (I think they are the figures).</p>
<p>Water doubling in price before 2012 has been widely written about so payback is unlikely to be that long at all for most users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neil</title>
		<link>http://melbourne.metblogs.com/2008/11/11/another-tool-for-minimising-water-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-3482</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 06:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://melbourne.metblogs.com/?p=2122#comment-3482</guid>
		<description>Great product but the breakeven point is 7~ years (not including installation). For me, according to the stats provided I think I will be looking at close to 20 years before I can retain my money. It would be a good government initiative to offer these to new houses.

Can&#039;t say this about most things but water is too damn cheap. Should be some sort of sliding scale. Less water reserves, higher the prices and vice versa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great product but the breakeven point is 7~ years (not including installation). For me, according to the stats provided I think I will be looking at close to 20 years before I can retain my money. It would be a good government initiative to offer these to new houses.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t say this about most things but water is too damn cheap. Should be some sort of sliding scale. Less water reserves, higher the prices and vice versa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
