<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old ad, same problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://melbourne.metblogs.com/2009/06/22/old-ad-same-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://melbourne.metblogs.com/2009/06/22/old-ad-same-problem/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:48:26 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: yankinoz</title>
		<link>http://melbourne.metblogs.com/2009/06/22/old-ad-same-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-3559</link>
		<dc:creator>yankinoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://melbourne.metblogs.com/?p=2528#comment-3559</guid>
		<description>While the &quot;it&#039;s/its&quot; confusion does bother me, it&#039;s also understandable. We&#039;re taught that possessives take the format &lt;i&gt;apostrophe+s&lt;/i&gt;: the farmer&#039;s crops, the plaintiff&#039;s objection, the Opposition&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theage.com.au/national/turnbull-linked-to-ute-leaker-20090623-cve0.html&quot; title=&quot;Utegate: Turnbull linked to ute leaker&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;regrettable blunder&lt;/a&gt;. I can understand looking at &quot;it&#039;s&quot; and seeing a possessive pronoun rather than a contraction. But yes, I do wish that these kinds of publicly displayed announcements were written (and proofed) more carefully.

It&#039;s tempting to blame text messaging for the decline in spelling standards, but remember when people blamed spell checkers in word processing programs? Wasn&#039;t all that long ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the &quot;it&#8217;s/its&quot; confusion does bother me, it&#8217;s also understandable. We&#8217;re taught that possessives take the format <i>apostrophe+s</i>: the farmer&#8217;s crops, the plaintiff&#8217;s objection, the Opposition&#8217;s <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/national/turnbull-linked-to-ute-leaker-20090623-cve0.html" title="Utegate: Turnbull linked to ute leaker" rel="nofollow">regrettable blunder</a>. I can understand looking at &quot;it&#8217;s&quot; and seeing a possessive pronoun rather than a contraction. But yes, I do wish that these kinds of publicly displayed announcements were written (and proofed) more carefully.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s tempting to blame text messaging for the decline in spelling standards, but remember when people blamed spell checkers in word processing programs? Wasn&#8217;t all that long ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ozsoapbox</title>
		<link>http://melbourne.metblogs.com/2009/06/22/old-ad-same-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-3558</link>
		<dc:creator>ozsoapbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://melbourne.metblogs.com/?p=2528#comment-3558</guid>
		<description>@dlutchy: it&#039;s isn&#039;t ownership, it&#039;s an abbreviated form of it is.

Here&#039;s the errors I spotted:

1. it&#039;s

2. as at (should be as of)

3. Outlet has a capital

That&#039;s pretty bad for an &#039;official&#039; publicly displayed sign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dlutchy: it&#8217;s isn&#8217;t ownership, it&#8217;s an abbreviated form of it is.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the errors I spotted:</p>
<p>1. it&#8217;s</p>
<p>2. as at (should be as of)</p>
<p>3. Outlet has a capital</p>
<p>That&#8217;s pretty bad for an &#8216;official&#8217; publicly displayed sign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dlutchy</title>
		<link>http://melbourne.metblogs.com/2009/06/22/old-ad-same-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-3557</link>
		<dc:creator>dlutchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 05:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://melbourne.metblogs.com/?p=2528#comment-3557</guid>
		<description>&quot;through it&#039;s Myer Stores&quot;.  
I didn&#039;t know that ticketmaster OWNS Myer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;through it&#8217;s Myer Stores&quot;.<br />
I didn&#8217;t know that ticketmaster OWNS Myer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adrock2xander</title>
		<link>http://melbourne.metblogs.com/2009/06/22/old-ad-same-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-3556</link>
		<dc:creator>adrock2xander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://melbourne.metblogs.com/?p=2528#comment-3556</guid>
		<description>One is grammar. The other is just a simple typo.

Don&#039;t have to be a fucking dick about it, Mr Anal-Retentive. Or do you not know the difference?

pwned norekthx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One is grammar. The other is just a simple typo.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t have to be a fucking dick about it, Mr Anal-Retentive. Or do you not know the difference?</p>
<p>pwned norekthx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alextokai</title>
		<link>http://melbourne.metblogs.com/2009/06/22/old-ad-same-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-3555</link>
		<dc:creator>alextokai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 02:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://melbourne.metblogs.com/?p=2528#comment-3555</guid>
		<description>&quot;spend more typed writing&quot;?
Come in, kettle. The pot is black, I repeat, black.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;spend more typed writing&quot;?<br />
Come in, kettle. The pot is black, I repeat, black.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
